Skip to main content

rip cd wright / will so miss your words, are so blessed and grateful for what we do have / thank you

I first saw C. D. Wright when I was a seventeen-year-old high-school senior enrolled in a pre-college writing program at Brown University. It took about five minutes of her reading in her distinctly Arkansan accent from her most recent bookā€”I believe it was ā€œTrembleā€ā€”before I realized I was in the presence of an utterly original American artist. When I returned to Brown as a freshman that fall, I followed her around, weaseled my way into her classes, and tried to figure out the source of her cool and how to siphon something from it. I never really figured it out. None of us has ever really figured it out. You canā€™t imitate unaffectedness and unpretentiousness and such peculiar brilliance in the classroom or on the page. But you know it when you see it, hear it.
Academics and reviewers and prize committees and various admirers have tried to pin C. D. down, typically with praise: a Southern poet ā€œof placeā€ (she probably hated that) or an erotic poet or a vanguard innovator or an elliptical or documentarian poet, etc. Such descriptions are both briefly true and ultimately insufficient, because she was one of the most formally restless and ambitious writers in the language. Even categorizing her as uncategorizable is too easy: she was part of a line of mavericks and contrarians who struggled to keep the language particular in times of ever-encroaching standardization. I think of the messy genius of James Agee and Mary Austin as two possible antecedents for her genre-bending, lyrically charged, often outraged and outrageous American English.
Across her career she wrote stunning discrete poems, but starting with the volume ā€œJust Whistle,ā€ from 1993, she began exploring and extending the possibilities of the book as a specific mediumā€”as a physical object encountered in time, as an environment. C. D. could write gorgeous lines and sentences and short lyrics (and titles, e.g. ā€œTranslations of the Gospel Back into Tonguesā€) but she was also uniquely capable of scaling up her attention to the larger architecture of the book as a form. Volumes like ā€œDeepstep Come Shining,ā€ ā€œCooling Time,ā€ ā€œOne Big Selfā€ (one of her many collaborations with the photographer Deborah Luster), and ā€œOne with Othersā€ braid research, reminiscence, and reportage with ode and elegy. Like many experimental poets, she wanted to test the limits of narrative, of reference. But C. D. never apologized for having or being a subject. She never fled into procedure; technique was in the service of the sharable, the felt. And her books, while never not political, were increasingly so. ā€œI believe,ā€ she wrote in a piece called ā€œOp Ed,ā€
in a hardheaded art, an unremitting, unrepentant practice of oneā€™s own faith in the word in oneā€™s own obstinate terms. I believe the word was made good from the start; it remains so to this second. I believe words are golden as goodness is golden. Even the humble word brush gives off a scratch of light. There is not much poetry from which I feel barred, whether it is arcane or open in the extreme. I attempt to run the gamut because I am pulled by the extremes. I believe the word used wrongly distorts the world. I hold to hard distinctions of right and wrong.
She had no illusions about what poetry could do in the face of ā€œthe factory model, the corporate model, the penitentiary model, which by my lights are one and the same.ā€ But she had no patience for disillusion, for those who would surrender their wonder before the world. (ā€œPoetry is the language of intensity. Because we are all going to die, an expression of intensity is justified.ā€)
Carolyn D. Wright was born in the Ozarks, in 1949, the daughter of a judge and a court reporter. From ā€œhills: an autobiographical prefaceā€:
My first wordsā€”Iā€™ve been toldā€”were obscene. My highchair was handed-down and painted over white. I remember the hard heels of my white shoes chipping at the paint of the rung. Brought up in a large unaestheticized house littered with Congressional Records and stenotype paper by a Chancery Judge and The Courtā€™s hazel-eyed Reporter who took down his every word which was law. Throughout my childhood I was knife-sharp and aquatic in sunlight. I read.
After attending college in Arkansas, she spent time in New York and San Francisco, where she met the poet Forrest Gander; they moved to Providence in 1983. Together they ran the small, legendary Lost Roads Press and raised their son, Brecht. She passed away yesterday morning.
And now Iā€™m sitting here surrounded by her booksā€”a new volume came out this monthā€”with the distinct feeling that I would need to possess C. D.ā€™s mixture of precision and pathos and dark humor in order to begin describing what weā€™ve lost. She was to me and so many poets an exemplary and inimitable figure. And I mean to emphasize the tension between ā€œexemplaryā€ and ā€œinimitableā€ā€”what her example taught us was the necessity of going our own way, of being one with others.

Popular Posts